Follow No Frack Ohio
Search
Recent News
News Archives

Recent Fracking News

Friday
Mar232012

Fracking Fluid Soaks Ohio

The nationwide boom in hydraulic fracturing—aka fracking—means energy-extraction companies in the U.S. can produce thousands of barrels of oil and millions of cubic feet of natural gas from once-inaccessible places. They’re also producing something else: oceans of brine from drilling as well as fracking fluid, the chemical-laced water used to blast open cracks in buried rock where fossil fuel lurks. That wastewater has to go someplace. John Kasich, Ohio’s governor, isn’t sure he wants his state to be it.

The preferred way to dispose of the brine and fracking fluid—typically a stew of water and a long list of chemical additives, including rust inhibitors and antibacterial agents—is to pump it out of sight, out of mind into deep, cavernous wells built for the purpose. Ohio’s geological underbelly, composed of permeable rock formations, is ideally suited for such holding tanks. The state is home to 176 of them, operated by more than 80 companies, including an affiliate of Houston-based giant EnerVest and smaller outfits such as BT Energy in Fleming, Ohio. Compare that with just six active wells in neighboring Pennsylvania, where the geology makes drilling less practical. Over the past two decades, Ohio approved an average of four new storage wells a year. Last year, it jumped to 29.

All that underground space has made Ohio a leading importer of wastewater from other states. Last year, oil and gas companies injected 511 million gallons into Ohio’s wells, the most on record, according to the state’s Department of Natural Resources. More than half came from elsewhere. Of the 94.2 million gallons of drilling wastewater that Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale operators sent to disposal wells last year, 98 percent went to Ohio. Currently, well owners pay the state a fee of 5¢ per barrel for fluids originating within Ohio and 20¢ for out-of-state wastewater. Ohio collected $1.45 million in fees last year, according to Ohio Natural Resources.

Kasich isn’t thrilled with the idea of Ohio becoming known as a dumping ground for other states’ industrial waste, though there isn’t much he can do about it. The Republican governor is pushing for tough new regulations to protect the environment, among them rules requiring oil and gas companies to account precisely for the chemical makeup of the spent fluid.

He’s also proposed taxing oil and gas drillers in Ohio as much as 4 percent of the market value of what they pull out of the ground, saying he’ll use the money to reduce the state income tax. The oil and gas tax has not been warmly received by the industry or by Republicans in the state legislature, who say it will hurt smaller companies trying to get a foothold in a growing industry. “When something’s in its infancy, and you’re going to put an onerous tax on it, that’s going to have a definite effect,” says Jerry James, president of Marietta-based Artex Oil.

Kasich believes he’s struck the right balance between attracting business and looking out for the public. When Barack Obama visited the state this month, he and Kasich talked about fracking. “I told the president that all of the rules and the regulations that we’re putting together … could serve as a national model as to how to proceed to be environmentally sound and yet still create jobs,” Kasich said last week.

Oil and gas companies haven’t put up as much of a fight over the proposed regulations, perhaps because they were introduced in the aftermath of a series of bizarre earthquakes near Youngstown that have been linked to the underground wastewater. There had been no record of quakes in the area before D&L Energy, based in Youngstown, began injecting wastewater into a well about 9,200 feet underground in December 2010. Starting in March, there were 12 quakes within a mile of the well ranging from magnitude 2.1 to a 4.0 quake that hit on New Year’s Eve.

A March 9 state report concluded that “a number of coincidental circumstances appear to make a compelling argument for the recent Youngstown-area seismic events to have been induced.” The state said evidence suggested fluid from the Youngstown well “intersected an unmapped fault in a near-failure state of stress causing movement along that fault.” D&L Energy maintains the cause of the earthquakes has not been conclusively determined, and says it will pay for its own study. In a statement, the company says it “has always been an environmentally responsible and legally operating energy producer that voluntarily implements industry best practices that exceed current laws and regulations.”

Ohio’s Department of Natural Resources has proposed a ban on drilling into deep rock formations and wants geological reviews before new wells are approved. State Representative Robert Hagan, a Democrat who represents Youngstown, doesn’t think that goes far enough. He’s called for an indefinite moratorium on injection wells until their impact can be studied more closely. “Some people have accused me of screaming, ‘The sky is falling,’” Hagan says. “But when the earth is moving, we have an obligation to find out why.”

 

The bottom line: Oil and natural gas companies are storing millions of gallons of drilling and fracking wastewater in Ohio’s 176 underground storage wells.

Wednesday
Mar212012

Dimock, PA Fracking: EPA Water Samples Contained 'Dangerous' Levels Of Methane

When the Environmental Protection Agency announced last week that tests showed the water is safe to drink in Dimock, Penn., a national hot spot for concerns about fracking, it seemed to vindicate the energy industry's insistence that drilling had not caused pollution in the area.

But what the agency didn't say -- at least, not publicly -- is that the water samples contained dangerous quantities of methane gas, a finding that confirmed some of the agency's initial concerns and the complaints raised by Dimock residents since 2009.

The test results also showed the group of wells contained dozens of other contaminants, including low levels of chemicals known to cause cancer and heavy metals that exceed the agency's "trigger level" and could lead to illness if consumed over an extended period of time. The EPA's assurances suggest that the substances detected do not violate specific drinking water standards, but no such standards exist for some of the contaminants and some experts said the agency should have acknowledged that they were detected at all.

"Any suggestion that water from these wells is safe for domestic use would be preliminary or inappropriate," said Ron Bishop, a chemist at the State University of New York's College at Oneonta, who has spoken out about environmental concerns from drilling.

Dimock residents are struggling to reconcile the EPA's public account with the results they have been given in private.

"I'm sitting here looking at the values I have on my sheet -- I'm over the thresholds -- and yet they are telling me my water is drinkable," said Scott Ely, a Dimock resident whose water contains methane at three times the state limit, as well as lithium, a substance that can cause kidney and thyroid disorders. "I'm confused about the whole thing... I'm flabbergasted."

The water in Dimock first became the focus of international attention after residents there alleged in 2009 that natural gas drilling, and fracking, had led to widespread contamination. That April, ProPublica reported that a woman's drinking water well blew up. Pennsylvania officials eventuallydetermined that underground methane gas leaks had been caused by Cabot Oil and Gas, which was drilling wells nearby. Pennsylvania sanctioned Cabot, and for a short time the company provided drinking water to households in the Dimock area.

This January, the EPA announced it would take over the state's investigation, testing the water in more than 60 homes and agreeing to provide drinking water to several of families -- including the Elys -- in the meantime.

Then, last Thursday, the EPA released a brief statement saying that the first 11 samples to come back from the lab "did not show levels of contamination that could present a health concern." The agency noted that some metals, methane, salt and bacteria had been detected, but at low levels that did not exceed federal thresholds. It said that arsenic exceeding federal water standards was detected in two samples.

But Dimock residents say the agency's description didn't jibe with the material in test packets distributed to them, and they voiced concerns about why the EPA had passed judgment before seeing results from nearly 50 homes. Several shared raw data and materials they were given by the EPA with Josh Fox, the director of the Academy Award-nominated documentary "GasLand," who shared them with ProPublica.

EPA press secretary Betsaida Alcantara said the agency was trying to be forthcoming by giving the tests results to Dimock residents and is now considering whether to release more information to the public about the water samples. "We made a commitment to the residents that we would give them the information as soon as we had it," she said. "For the sake of transparency we felt it was the right thing to do."

However preliminary, the data is significant because it is the first EPA research into drilling-related concerned on the east coast, and the agency's first new information since it concluded that there was likely a link between fracking and water contamination in central Wyoming last December. The EPA is currently in the midst of a national investigation into the effects of fracking on groundwater, but that research is separate.

As the agency has elsewhere, the EPA began the testing in Dimock in search of methane and found it.

Methane is not considered poisonous to drink, and therefore is not a health threat in the same way as other pollutants. But the gas can collect in confined spaces and cause deadly explosions, or smother people if they breathe too much of it. Four of the five residential water results obtained by ProPublica show methane levels exceeding Pennsylvania standards; one as high as seven times the threshold and nearly twice the EPA's less stringent standard.

The methane detections were accompanied by ethane, another type of natural gas that experts say often signifies the methane came from deeply buried gas deposits similar to those being drilled for energy and not from natural sources near the surface.

Among the other substances detected at low levels in Dimock's water are a suite of chemicals known to come from some sort of hydrocarbon substance, such as diesel fuel or roofing tar. They include anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene -- all substances described by a branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as cancer-causing even in very small amounts. Chromium, aluminum, lead and other metals were also detected, as were chlorides, salts, bromium and strontium, minerals that can occur naturally but are often associated with natural gas drilling.

It is unclear whether these contaminants have any connection to drilling activities near Dimock. The agency says it plans further testing and research.

Many of the compounds detected have not been evaluated for exposure risk by federal scientists or do not have an exposure limit assigned to them, making it difficult to know whether they present a risk to human health.

Inconsistencies in the EPA's sampling results also are raising concerns. EPA documents, for example, list two different thresholds for the detection of bromide, a naturally occurring substance sometimes used in drilling fluids, opening up the possibility that bromide may have been detected, but not reported, in some tests.

"The threshold that it is safe, that shouldn't be changing," said Susan Riha, director of the New York State Water Resources Group and a professor of earth sciences at Cornell University. "For some reason ... one was twice as sensitive as the other one."

The EPA did not respond to questions about the detection limits, or any other technical inquiries about the test data.

A spokesman for Cabot declined to comment on the water test results or their significance, saying that he had not yet seen the data.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/20/dimock-pa-fracking-epa-water_n_1368148.html?ref=green

Wednesday
Mar212012

In state's fracking report, politics threatens to trump science 

If you read the first nine pages of the state's draft report on fracking, you will be unprepared for the punch line at the end.

Written by the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the 444-page report was released March 16. It clearly lays out the many potential perils associated with the controversial drilling method.(Download and read the full report here; the PDF is 32 MB. The first 10 pages are the summary.)

It addresses the serious environmental, economic and public health problems that could result from fracking in the state.

It discusses the dearth of data on North Carolina's geology as it relates to natural gas resources and the lack of a comprehensive study—anywhere—on long-term health impacts of fracking.

It discusses the state's immense permitting, regulatory and enforcement requirements if fracking were to be legalized—none of which have been written.

It acknowledges the short time frame—just nine months—in which the department had to collect data, commission studies and write a mammoth, and politically sensitive, report.

And it notes that the consumer protection portion, to be drafted by the N.C. Department of Justice, is missing.

Then, on page 10 of the summary, the report reads, "DENR believes that hydraulic fracturing can be done safely as long as the right protections are in place."

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
Mar212012

Panelists: Local action needed to rein in fracking

An attorney from an Ohio environmental group and a community activist from Athens County gave a tutorial Tuesday to a Licking County audience on how to gain control of fracking when it arrives.

Nathan Johnson, a lawyer for the Buckeye Forest Council, talked about Ohio laws affecting oil and gas drilling. Al Blazevicius spoke about his efforts to enact regulations on fracking in Athens County, where a good deal of land has been leased for drilling.

There are significant deposits of oil and gas in deep-lying shale in eastern Ohio. The minerals are extracted by forcing a large volume of water, sand and chemicals into cracks in the shale.

Licking County has deposits of oil in the shale layer, said Gary Sitler, a local driller and Granville resident. Industry experts said the area is on the verge of an oil and gas boom and many local property owners have signed leases agreeing to testing and/or drilling on their property.

Tuesday's forum, the second in a series of three sponsored by the Denison University's Office of Sustainabilty, focused on the effect of fracking on the community. About 75 people attended.

Before the panelists spoke, two video clips were shown documenting pollution from shale fracking in Pennsylvania. In one instance, a water well was contaminated; in the other, a pond was polluted by runoff from the pad of a drilling site.

Blazevicius said after persistent efforts, he and other residents were able to convince the Athens County commissioners to work with them to develop stronger state and local regulations on fracking.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Mar202012

Patriot slams limits in new EPA permit

The new permit signed by OEPA Director Scott Nally takes effect April 1 and will halt Warren’s ability to accept treated fracking wastewater from Patriot or any other entity.

Patriot can still accept fracking wastewater from Utica and Marcellus shale exploration but has to find a different method of disposal or reuse, such as recycling or injection-well disposal, said Mike Settles, OEPA spokesman.

Separately, OEPA granted Patriot a permit to accept and treat new wastewater sources from other industries, but Blocksom considered it “a smokescreen” because 98 percent of Patriot’s business is treating fracking wastewater.

Patriot can treat up to 100,000 gallons of fluid per day.

Warren’s new permit, which will replace one that expired at the end of January, comes in the middle of a legal battle involving OEPA, Patriot, Warren and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources.

The state has said it unlawfully issued permits regarding Patriot’s operations, but the Environmental Review Appeals Commission recently confirmed the legality of the permits.

Legal proceedings, including a hearing in Trumbull County Common Pleas Court, scheduled for Wednesday, are still pending.

But Settles said the entity felt it was time to issue a new permit.

“The appeals of [Patriot’s] original permit are still pending,” he told The Vindicator on Monday. “That could take some time

http://www.vindy.com/news/2012/mar/20/patriot-slams-limits-in-new-epa-permit/

Tuesday
Mar202012

Navarre officials say no to 'fracking' in village

For Village Council, the best course of action involves taking no action at all.

Monday, council agreed to take no action regarding permission to allow hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” within village limits.

A few months ago, council was approached by companies seeking permission to drill in the village. Since that time, Mayor Bob Benson said he continues to receive phone calls from companies seeking permission to drill. During a regular meeting Monday, he confirmed that council wanted to stick with its original plan.

“We did not want to take action, because we had some concerns,” Benson said after the meeting. “We felt it was safer to stay out of it all together.”

Benson said that the village has been assured the process is environmentally safe, but many concerns involve what could happen down the road.

“What about 50 years from now?” Benson said. “What if something breaks down the line and it messes up our aquifers?”

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Mar202012

South Africa debates whether to allow fracking

South Africa's Karoo region is a pristine wilderness of red hills and wildflowers. It is beautiful, desperately poor and is now the new frontline in the global battle over a hugely controversial drilling practice called "fracking".

The semi-desert area of about 400,000 sq km in the west of the country is home to what could be one of the largest deposits of shale gas in the world, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA) - possibly enough to supply the country with gas for the next 400 years.

But the country is not sure whether to allow the gas to be extracted by fracking.

Fracking supporters say it is the future of energy; detractors that it is an environmental disaster - and the resource-rich country does not have laws in place to properly regulate what is literally an "earth-shattering" type of exploration, which can pollute water sources.

Both sides are furiously lobbying the government - and two major reports have just been published to back up their arguments.

Click to read more ...

Page 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 41 Next 7 Entries »