Fracking' debate exposes weaknesses in Ohio Statehouse -- term limits and the death of home rule: Thomas Suddes
Still, Statehouse history is telling. In 2004, the General Assembly took away any right that Ohio's cities and villages had to regulate the "permitting, location and spacing" of oil and gas wells. That is, if someone wants to drill for oil and gas in your town, he or she doesn't need your OK. Someone in Columbus gets to decide.
The 2004 "pre-emption" bill's lead sponsor was then-Rep. Thomas Niehaus, a suburban Cincinnati Republican who is now the state Senate's president. Niehaus is one of the few people backing the pre-emption bill who is still in the General Assembly. And even he'll have to leave in December, thanks to Ohio's inane legislative term limits.
Consider the House's 2004 roll call on his bill. The vote, not especially partisan, was 59 in favor, 35 opposed. Of the 59 House members who voted "yes," only 11 are still in the legislature. Ten are now state senators, including Niehaus; Thomas Patton, a Strongsville Republican; Michael Skindell, a Lakewood Democrat; and James Hughes of Columbus, Tim Schaffer of Lancaster and Christopher Widener of Springfield, all Republicans.
One House "yes" has returned to the House after a term-limit hiatus: Rep. Ron Young, a Leroy Township Republican.
The House's remaining 48 "yeas" on Niehaus' 2004 bill are long gone, most due to term limits. Likewise, of the 26 state senators who voted "yes" on the Niehaus bill in 2004, only seven are still in the legislature (all now as House members).
What those numbers mean is that few people in the Ohio General Assembly today are accountable for fracking in Ohio -- or anything else. And fewer yet (except pro-fracking lobbyists) know anything about the specific issues raised in the 2004 debate. That is, when it comes to political deniability, term limits make Pontius Pilate seem like an amateur.